THE SCHOOL OF MODERNITY: THE ARCHITECTURE OF EIGHT INTELLIGENCES

Ozhet Arshyn, Seimur Etibar Ogly Mamedov, Turlybek Turkpenovich Musabayev

Abstract


Introduction. The architecture of school buildings plays a vital role in shaping the educational environment and influencing learning processes. Purpose of the study: To investigate how the architectural and spatial organization of modern school buildings in Astana can be aligned with the theory of Multiple Intelligences, with the goal of identifying planning principles and design strategies that support the comprehensive intellectual development of students across all eight intelligence types. Methods: The study defines temporal and territorial boundaries, analyzes urban structure analysis, employs field survey methods, collection and analysis of architectural documentation, and a review of theoretical foundations. An additional focus is placed on methods of interaction, interpreted as architectural-spatial typologies of communication and environmental stylistics that support different modes of learning and engagement. Results: The analysis revealed that the existing school architecture typologies in Astana predominantly support linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligences through traditional classroom-based layouts. However, architecture elements that encourage the development of other types of intelligence — such as music rooms, art studios, outdoor learning zones, and flexible collaborative spaces — are inconsistently present and often marginalized in spatial hierarchy. The study identified architectural features that correlate with the activation of different intelligences, including amphitheater-style gathering spaces (interpersonal), green inner courtyards (naturalistic), maker spaces (bodily-kinesthetic), and modular classroom arrangements (intrapersonal). Based on the findings, the authors propose a planning model for a multi-intelligence-oriented school, in which functional zones are organized to provide spatial stimuli aligned with each intelligence type. This model demonstrates a potential direction for rethinking school architecture as an adaptive and inclusive educational infrastructure.

Keywords


school architecture; educational system; types of intelligence; book-frontal method; classroom-lesson system; comfortable environment; architectural and planning methods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amanzhol, K. and Yerkin, A. (2006). History of Kazakhstan: A Textbook for Higher Education Institutions. Saint Petersburg: Solart.

Gardner, H. (2007). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Moscow: Williams Publishing.

Gladilina, I., Sergeeva, S., Deputatova, N., Skvortsova, M., Bereznyakovskiy, V., Silaeva, A., Karabayev, G., and Mamedov, S. (2022). Prospects for the Development of University Campuses Integrated into Urban Environment in Russia and Kazakhstan. Civil Engineering and Architecture 11(6), pp. 3347–3354. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2023.110610.

Gvozdikova, T. A. and Amandykova D. (2023). Promoting Inclusive Education in Kazakhstan: Environmental and Architectural Aspects. ISVS e-journal, 10 (4), pp. 201–210.

Kiseleva, T. A. (2019). Development of the Network of General Educational Institutions in the Urban Structure of Astana in the 19th - 21st Centuries. PhD Thesis in Architecture.

Lackney, J. A. (1994). Educational Facilities: The Impact and Role of the Physical Environment of the School on Teaching, Learning, and Educational Outcomes. Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Mark, D. (2000). Architecture of Schools: The New Learning Environments. Architectural Press.

Pak, C., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, G., Hwang, J. S., and Ku, S. (2023). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Science Lessons: Teachers’ Experiences and Views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10 (1), p. 61. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3.

Poznyak, S. V. (2009) Architectural and Planning Organization of a School Building in the Context of the Information Society (on the Example of Samara). PhD Thesis in Architecture.

Sadykova, S. Sh. (2022). Innovative Trends in the Formation of Internal Educational Spaces of New Schools in Kazakhstan. Vestnik QazBSQA, Architecture and Design, 4 (86), pp. 79–87. DOI: 10.51488/1680-080x/2022.4-08.

Samoilova, N. V. and Chislova, I. Yu. (2017). Modern Global Trends in School Planning and Their Application in Domestic Practice. Vestnik Magistratury, 2-2 (65), pp. 40–43.

Sanoff, H. (2001). School Building Assessment Methods. Washington D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

Upitis, R. (2004). School Architecture and Complexity. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 19–38. DOI: 10.29173/cmplct8713.

Woolner, P. (2010). The Design of Learning Spaces. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055