FROM SOCIAL HOUSING TO HERITAGE: ASSESSING THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY AND HERITAGE VALUES OF MODERNIST LARGE HOUSING ESTATES IN ORAN (1950–1962), ALGERIA

Farah Kefif, Zakaria Bendjima

Abstract


Introduction. Thus far, no study has systematically developed criteria for assessing the heritage value of social housing as a built legacy, despite their significant role in shaping urban and architectural identity. The purpose of this study aims to identify and evaluate the architectural significance of such estates, with the goal of informing strategies for their potential preservation and contributing to broader reflections on heritage production. In this context, a comparative assessment was carried out on four large housing estates in the city of Oran, selected based on key factors including the architect’s reputation, the diversity of urban forms, and the mixed designation of housing for both Muslim and European communities, which reflects the complex social and historical fabric of the city. The research adopts a Mixed Methods Research (MMR) approach, integrating qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive assessment. The qualitative component relied on semi-structured interviews, allowing for the identification of new evaluation criteria grounded in expert and local knowledge. The quantitative component involved 200 questionnaires distributed to two groups’ inhabitants and professionals whose responses were systematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti software to reveal patterns and perceptions regarding heritage value. Findings from this comparative study indicate that heritage values vary across cases depending on the relevance of specific criteria, highlighting the importance of selecting contextually meaningful indicators. These criteria not only influence the evaluation of each estate but also inform heritage conservation strategies tailored to local urban and social contexts. Ultimately, the study provides essential reference points for the recognition, appreciation, and preservation of Algerian domestic architecture from the second half of the twentieth century, offering insights that may guide similar assessments in other urban contexts.

Keywords


social housing; heritage values; assessment criteria; stakeholders; modern architecture; Oran (Algeria)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angers, M. (1996). Initiation pratique à la méthodologie des sciences humaines (Practical introduction to human sciences methodology). (4e ed.). Anjou: Éditions CEC. (In French).

Aouchal, H. (2023). Cultural heritage management in Africa: the heritage of the colonized, edited by George Okello Abungu and Webber Ndoro. Routledge, Abingdon. DOI: 10.1186/s43238-023-00100-5.

Bacqué, M. H. and Gauthier, M. (2011). Participation, Urban Planning and Urban Studies: Four Decades of Debates and Experiments since S. R. Arnstein’s “A ladder of citizen participation”. Participations, 1 (1), pp. 36–66. DOI: 10.3917/parti.001.0036.

Baribeau, C. (2005). L’instrumentation dans la collecte de données’, Recherches qualitatives (2), 98–114.

Bos, M., Stiernon, D., and van Moeseke, G. (2022). Accompagnement à l’évaluation patrimoniale du bâti résidentiel bruxellois. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvai.

Brunel, G. (2015). The value fair. CeROArt. Conservation, exposition, Restauration d’Objets d’Art. No. HS. Association CeROArt asbl. DOI: 10.4000/ceroart.4639.

Camus, A. (1947). La peste, Éditions Gallimard.

Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., and Lehmann, S. (2015). Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations. Supply Chain Management, 20 (2), pp. 179–204.

Courbebaisse, A. and Issot, N. (2022). Large housing estates or how to reconcile refurbishment and heritagisation? In Situ. Revue des patrimoines, 47. DOI: 10.4000/insitu.34440.

Davallon, J. (2006). Le don du patrimoine, Une approche communicationnelle de la patrimonialisation. Extrait du Revue du Mauss permanente, pp. 89–126.

De la Torre, M. (2014). Values in heritage conservation: A project of the Getty conservation institute’, APT Bulletin: The Journal of Preservation Technology, 45.2/3, pp. 19–24.

Elizondo, L. (2024). Dwelling by appropriation: identity and attachment in low-income housing in Monterrey, Mexico. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39 (1), pp. 473-492. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-023-10083-5.

Fredheim, L.H and Khalaf, M. (2016). The significance of values: Heritage value typologies re-examined’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22.6, pp. 466–481.

Granath Hansson, A. and Lundgren, B. (2019). Defining social housing: A discussion on the suitable criteria. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(2), pp. 149-166. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2018.1459826.

Grignolo, R. (2018). An Encyclopedic Approach to the Conservation of 20th-Century Architecture. Built Heritage, 2 (2), pp. 93-102. DOI: 10.1186/bf03545696.

Gyurkovich, M., Sotoca García, A., Matusik, A., Szarata, A., Szczerek, E., Suchón, F., and Poklewski-Koziell, D. (2021). Housing estates from the second half of the twentieth century as urban heritage structures: Example of housing estates in Mistrzejowice, Cracow. Wiadomosci Konserwatorskie, (65), pp. 54–65.

Hadbi, R. (2020). Revealing What Makes Heritage to Envision the Urban Renewal of Three Low-Rent Housing Buildings in Grenoble. Les Cahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère 8. DOI: 10.4000/craup.4606.

Harrer, A. (2017). The Legacy of Alois Riegl: material authenticity of the monument in the digital age. Built heritage, 1 (2), pp. 29–40. DOI: 10.1186/bf03545661.

Issot, N. (2023). To a Method of Social Housing Estate’s Rehabilitation More Respectful of Residents and Use Values. The Case of Ancely, in Toulouse. Le cas d’Ancely, à Toulouse’, Les Cahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère, 19. DOI: 10.4000/craup.13598.

Kefif, F. and Hendel, M. (2024). A Typological Identification of the Large Housing Estates of 1950s in Oran. Exploring the Three-Dimensional Approach. Journal of Architectural and Engineering Research, 7, pp. 71–83. DOI: 10.54338/27382656-2024.7-07.

Kim, S.-Y., Lee, Y.-S., Nguyen, V. T., and Luu, V. T. (2016). Barriers to applying value management in the Vietnamese construction industry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21 (2), pp. 55–80.

Laurent, X. (2003) Grandeur et misère du patrimoine, d’André Malraux à Jacques Duhamel’ (1959-1973). Vol. 15. Librairie Droz.

Legget, J. (2018). Shared heritage, shared authority, shared accountability? Co-generating museum performance criteria as a means of embedding ‘shared authority’. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(7), pp. 723–742. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1413679.

Lemaitre, A. (2020). Critique d’un outil méthodologique à travers l’étude d’un objet métis. In CeROArt. Conservation, exposition, Restauration d’Objets d’Art (No. 12). Association CeROArt asbl.

Matović, N. and Ovesni, K. (2023). Interaction of quantitative and qualitative methodology in mixed methods research: integration and / or combination. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26 (1), pp. 51–65. DOI:10.1080/13645579.2021.1964857.

Pinson, D. (2016). L’habitat, relevé et révélé par le dessin: observer l’espace construit et son appropriation. Revue Espaces et sociétés, 1, pp. 49–66.

Reichen, B. (2000). Des villes nommés désir’, Dynamic City; Culot, M., Ed.; Skira-Seuil: Bruxelles, Belgium.

Robert, A. (2023). Méthodes d’enquêtes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales: approche réflexive Libérer la parole habitante.

Rudolff, B. (2006). Intangible’and ‘tangible’heritage’, A Topology of Culture in Context of Faith. PhD thesis.

Shwani, D. L. (2021). The Importance of Triangulation Methodology in Sociology. Qalaai Zanist Journal, 6 (2), pp. 284–303.

Tapie, G. (2014). Sociologie de l’habitat contemporain. Vivre l’architecture’, Parenthèses éditions.

Trainer, T. (2018). The simpler way: Housing, living and settlements. In Housing for degrowth, pp. 120–130. Routledge.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055