RESTRUCTURING ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION POST COVID-19: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY EXPECTATIONS

Rajeev Garg, Anoop K. Sharma, Mohammad Arif Kamal

Abstract


Introduction: It is clear that there is a gap between academic knowledge and professional practice in the field of architecture. Based on feedback from the industry, recent graduates lack the required skills, technical knowledge, and professional competencies. To keep pace with the rapidly changing technological scenario, the entire curriculum and syllabus of undergraduate (UG) level architectural education in India need restructuring and revision with reference to the contents to be taught and technical skills to be gained. In the past few years, student enrollment in UG-level architecture programs in India has declined, whereas demand projected experiences an upward movement. Purpose of the study: We aimed to restructure architectural education post COVID-19 pandemic with reference to professional practice and market expectations. For that purpose, we needed to review various aspects of higher education, the current scenario, and graduate attributes and reformulate those in terms of architectural education. It has become imperative to strengthen architectural education, especially post COVID-19 crisis. Prospective future professionals should be trained to meet the construction industry expectations while continuing their independent lifelong learning to ensure their global acceptability. Methods: The study methodology involves a market survey to analyze the current situation and determine construction industry expectations for recent graduates of architecture programs. The survey covered representatives of academia and construction industry professionals. Results and Discussion: The findings show that there is potential for restructuring the architectural education curriculum to both suit the educational purpose and meet the industry expectations. Its restructuring with a fresh approach will help architecture students learn more thoroughly how to become professionals ready to work in the Indian market as well as accept the global challenges presented by changing technology. The outcome of this study is presented in the form of a simple model curriculum, which can be adopted by institutions imparting architectural education.

Keywords


Architectural education, curriculum design, post COVID-19 education, architects, market-ready professionals, construction industry expectations, B. Arch. model curriculum.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adirika, B. N. (2017). Examining models of curriculum development and processes: implications for African educational heritage and review. Social Science and Humanities Journal, Vol. 1, Issue 6, pp. 325–342.

Chang, T.-Y., Hong, G., Paganelli, C., Phantumvanit, P., Chang, W.-J., Shieh, Y.-S. and Hsu, M.-L. (2021). Innovation of dental education during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 15–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.011.

Council of Architecture (2020a). COA Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.coa.gov.in/app/myauth/notification/COA_Minimum_Standards_of_Architectural_Education_Regulations_2020.pdf [Date accessed 04.04.2022].

Council of Architecture (2020b). Perspective Plan for Growth of Architectural Education. [online] Available at: https://www.coa.gov.in/showfile.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=753&lid=605 [Date accessed 15.03.2022].

Council of Architecture (2021). Annual Report 2019-2020. [online] Available at: https://www.coa.gov.in/app/myauth/report/Annual%20Report%2020192020.pdf [Date accessed 30.02.2022].

Dhanalakshmi, R., Mary, A. A., Shrijith, D. and Vijayaraghavan, N. (2021). A study on COVID-19 – impacting Indian education. Materials Today: Proceedings, in press. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.786.

Fakhry, M., Kamel, I. and Abdelaal, A. (2021). CAD using preference compared to hand drafting in architectural working drawings coursework. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 3331–3338. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2021.01.016.

Ghonim, M. and Eweda, N. (2018). Investigating elective courses in architectural education. Frontiers of Architectural Research, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 235–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2018.03.006.

Johnson, S. and Ramadas, G. (2020). Disruptions in the process of engineering education - a curriculum design perspective. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 172, pp. 277–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.044.

Khodeir, L. M. and Nessim, A. A. (2020). Changing skills for architecture students employability: Analysis of job market versus architecture education in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 811–821. DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.11.006.

Kulkarni, V. N., Gaitonde, V. N., Kotturshettar, B. B. and Jangali Satish G. (2020). Adapting industry based curriculum design for strengthening post graduate programs in Indian scenario. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 172, pp. 253–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.040.

Martín-Alonso, D., Sierra, E. and Blanco, N. (2021). Relationships and tensions between the curricular program and the lived curriculum. A narrative research. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 105, 103433. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103433/

Matthias, I. and Boxall, M. (2021). Is tomorrow’s university system already emerging? [online] Available at: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2021/06/11/is-tomorrows-university-system-already-emerging/ [Date accessed 30.02.2022].

Ministry of Human Resource Development. Government of India (2020). National Education Policy 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf [Date accessed 15.03.2022].

Mishra, L., Gupta, T. and Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, Vol. 1, 100012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012.

Ozkaynak, M. G. and Ust, S. (2012). New forms of design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 51, pp. 140–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.133.

PA Consulting (2021). How can higher education thrive post-pandemic? [online] Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/hub/pa-consulting/p/how-can-higher-education-thrive-post-pandemic [Date accessed 23.03.2022].

Parashar, A. K. and Parashar, R. (2012). Innovations and curriculum development for engineering education and research in India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 56, pp. 685–690. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.704.

Pillai, S. S. (2016). Curriculum design and development. [online] Available at: https://www.unom.ac.in/asc/Pdf/CURRICULUM%20DESIGN%20AND%20DEVELOPMENT-1.pdf [Date accessed 05.02.2022].

Rodriguez, J. (2020). Modularization of new course for integration in existing curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 172, pp. 817–822. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.117.

Soliman, S., Taha, D. and El Sayad, Z. (2019). Architectural education in the digital age: Computer applications: Between academia and practice. Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 58, Issue 2, pp. 809–818. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.05.016

Tadesse, S. and Muluye, W. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: a review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 159–170. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2020.810011.

UNESCO (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. [online] Available at: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/education_in_a_post-covid_world-nine_ideas_for_public_action.pdf [Date accessed 23.03.2022].

Zhao, Y. and Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 3–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2022-7-2-29-41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055