HOUSEHOLD BUILDING (LATE 17TH–19TH CENTURY, RYAZAN KREMLIN) RESTORATION AND ADAPTATION TO MODERN USE

Marina Knyazeva, Sergey Mokhovikov, Lidia Alekseenko, Natalya Bryazgunova

Abstract


Introduction: The issue of preserving historical and cultural heritage is currently highly relevant. The restoration of
ancient architectural structures, preservation of their historical appearance, and adaptation to new functions constitute an important step forward towards that goal. Considering the situation with cultural heritage sites in Ryazan, we should note that the city really needs such measures. Many historical, cultural, and architectural monuments have been lost and continue to be destroyed because of incompetent interference with their architectural-and-planning structure (demolition, unauthorized reconstruction, etc.). Purpose of the study: We aimed to describe the specifics of the preservation, restoration, and adaptation of cultural and historical heritage sites to modern needs. Methods: In the course of the study, we used a systemic approach, analyzed various sources and materials on the restoration and protection of historical and architectural monuments. Results: In the paper, we consider a particular example from the architectural practice of adapting a part of an ancient structure to modern use. The paper gives a brief historical background and information on the structures and materials used, discusses methods and technological solutions, analyzes design solutions. Based on the results of the works conducted, we determine issues of adapting a recognized cultural heritage site to modern living conditions and using it in a new capacity in accordance with the applicable regulatory documents. When facing the issue of adapting historical buildings that have lost their original function, it is necessary to perform works without changing their protected features. Within the framework of cultural heritage site preservation, a concept has been developed to serve as the basis for its conversion and operation as a cafe.

Keywords


Cultural heritage site, architectural monument, preservation, restoration, adaptation to modern use, methods and techniques, Ryazan Kremlin, Ryazan.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldohdar, H. N. (2020). The role of heritage tourism in preserving historical buildings in Palestine (case study of the Pasha’s Palace, Gaza). Architecture and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 3–7. DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-2-03-07.

Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology (2018). State Standard GOST R 54401-2011. The preservation of cultural heritage objects. Accessibility of cultural heritage objects for people with limited mobility. General requirements. Moscow: Standartinform, 11 p.

Gerasimova, K. I. and Karasova, I. Yu. (2020). Modernization of historical heritage. In: Cheremisin, A. B. (ed.) Modern Science and its Resourcing: Innnovation Paradigm. Proceedings of the 4th International Research and Practice Conference. Petrozavodsk: New Science International Center for Scientific Partnership, pp. 94–102.

Khakimov, D. R. and Trebukhin, A. F. (2019). Features of the conservation and adaptation of cultural heritage to modern conditions. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, No. 1, Vol. 11 [online] Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/78SAVN119.pdf [Date accessed 30.06.2022].

Klimova, U. (2017). The best parks of the world: the Duisburg Nord Landscape Park in Westphalia. [online] Available at: https://parkseason.ru/articles/luchshiye-parki-mira-duysburg-nord-v-vestfalii/ [Date accessed December 5, 2021].

Kolesnikova, V. I. (ed.) (2012). Collection of Russian architectural monuments and works of monumental art. Ryazan Region. In 4 parts. Part 1. Moscow: Indrik, 880 p.

Markovich, O. B. and Luchkova, V. I. (2011). Adaptive using of architecture monuments. In: New Ideas of New Century: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference at Pacific National University, Vol. 1. Khabarovsk: Pacific National University, pp. 391–396.

Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation (2017). Regulations SP 59.13330.2016. Accessibility of buildings and structures for persons with reduced mobility. Moscow: Standartinform, 31 p.

Mokhovikov, S. V., Alekseenko, L. V., Knyazeva, M. V., Murog, I. A., and Larina, O. S. (2019). Studies of cultural heritage sites of federal significance. Amazonia Investiga, Vol. 8, No. 21, pp. 296–306.

Novopashina, E. I., Golubev, K. V., and Dmitriukov, M. S. (2012). Issues of the monuments of Perm history and culture readjustment to modern usage. Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Applied Ecology. Urban Development, No. 4 (8), pp. 30–39.

Pankratova, A. A. and Solov’ev, A. K. (2015). Problems of preservation and use of historical buildings in the modern urban architecture. Vestnik MGSU, No. 7, pp. 7–16. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2015.7.7-16.

Pastukh, O., Gray, T., and Golovina, S. (2020). Restored layers: reconstruction of historical sites and restoration of architectural heritage: the experience of the United States and Russia (case study of St. Petersburg). Architecture and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 17–24. DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-2-17-24.

Pravdolyubova, S., Vekilyan, M., Nechiporuk, G., Kozhnova, A., and Guseva, S. (2021). The practice of using the golden section in architecture in the city of Ryazan. Architecture and Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 50–57. DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2021-6-1-50-57.

Romanova, L. S. (2017). Adaptation of cultural heritage sites to new functions. Tomsk: Publishing House of the Tomsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 98 p.

Sakharova, O. A. (2011). Experience of formation of a modern complex of buildings from the objects carried to monuments stories and architecture. Vestnik MGSU, No. 1-2, pp. 112–117.

Sokolov, Yu. V. (2016). The modern use of architectural monuments. Humanities Scientific Researches, No. 7 [online] Available at: http://human.snauka.ru/2016/07/15840 [Date accessed January 23, 2021].

Solntsev, I. V. and Petrov, A. A. (2013). Applying the concept of the most effective utilization to architectural monuments valuation. Economic Strategies, Vol. 15, No. 4 (112), pp. 70–77.

Tmbreg.ru (2015). The main house of the Karaul Estate. [online] Available at: Expertiza_Karaul_chertezhi.pdf (tmbreg.ru) [Date accessed January 23, 2021].

UNESCO (2021). UNESCO-Welterbe Industriekomplex Zeche Zollverein in Essen. Industriedenkmal im Stil des Bauhauses. [online] Available at: https://www.unesco.de/kultur-und-natur/welterbe/welterbe-deutschland/industriekomplex-zeche-zollverein-essen [Date accessed December 5, 2021].

Valegrakhov, V. M. (2014). Applicability of the three approaches to valuation of cultural heritage objects analysis. Economic System Management, No. 11 (71), 1.

Zhitlova, V. A. and Petreneva, O. V. (2019). On the issue of preservation and adaptation of cultural heritage for modern use. In: Modern Technologies in Construction. Theory and Practice, Vol. 1, pp. 350–355.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2022-7-3-13-20

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055