USING DIGITAL SOFTWARE TO DESIGN INTERACTIVE SMART CANOPIES FOR THE OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT

Ayam Sh. Altameemi, Adil M. Jabbar

Abstract


Introduction: Canopies can serve as valuable elements in the environment when designed to harmonize with their surroundings. Moreover, incorporating recyclable materials in their construction can enhance both their aesthetic appeal and environmental ecological integrity. This study focuses on the design and implementation of a responsive canopy that adapts to environmental conditions by employing advanced digital design software. It also aims to promote sustainability through the use of recycled materials, thereby contributing to environmental preservation and reducing negative impacts. Methods: The canopy consists of a skin supported by a series of connected forms and features six circular mirrors that rotate about an axis to change their orientation. This innovative approach to intelligent and dynamic skin design is intended to optimize light management and control solar radiation. The portable modules are designed using Grasshopper and Rhinoceros software, in conjunction with Arduino and Firefly, ensuring a seamless integration between physical design and functional operation. These modules are programmed to close during the day and open at night, enabling effective responses to environmental changes. Results: The design encourages interactive engagement between the installation and its surroundings by utilizing reflective materials, enhancing both its aesthetic appeal and functional performance. However, it is important to note that the mechanisms controlling the mirror movements present certain functional challenges, requiring ongoing maintenance to ensure optimal performance.

Keywords


smart canopy; Grasshopper and Rhino software; Arduino; Firefly software; digital architecture; environmental response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Fakhrey Farhat, M. (2021). Digital architecture and its impact on modeling of interior design of spaces. International Journal of Architectural Engineering and Urban Research, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 226–260. DOI: 10.21608/ijaeur.2021.217858.

Al-Busaidi, M. S. and Mohatram, M. (2020). Designing an automatic awning system powered by solar energy. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 29–37.

Arduino Maual. (2025). The Lancet Arduino UNO R3 User Manual SKU: A000066 Description. [online] Available at: https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/uno-rev3 [Access Date: March 26, 2025].

Bahlol, W. S. E. (2014). The impact of digital revolution on the field of architectural function and form. Journal of Urban Research, Vol. 12, pp. 1–12.

Castro Pena, M. L., Carballal, A., Rodríguez-Fernández, N., Santos, I., and Romero, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence applied to conceptual design. A review of its use in architecture. Automation in Construction, Vol. 124. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103550.

Chairiyah, R., Yetti, A. E., and Pujiyanti, I. (2022). The Grasshopper+Rhino for 3D modelling in Indonesian’s education of biomimetic architecture. In: Satwiko, P., Khaerunnisa, and Sekarlangit, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the International Webinar on Digital Architecture 2021 (IWEDA 2021), pp. 223–229. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220703.041.

Dananjaya, S. A. V., Chevali, V. S., Dear, J. P., Potluri, P., and Abeykoon, C. (2024). 3D printing of biodegradable polymers and their composites – current state-of-the-art, properties, applications, and machine learning for potential future applications. Progress in Materials Science, Vol. 146, 101336. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101336.

Dasari, S. K., Fantuzzi, N., Trovalusci, P., Panei, R., and Pingaro, M. (2023). Optimal design of a canopy using parametric structural design and a genetic algorithm. Symmetry, Vol. 15, issue 1, 142. DOI: 10.3390/sym15010142.

Digrado, A., Mitchell, N. G., Montes, C. M., Dirvanskyte, P., and Ainsworth, E. A. (2020). Assessing diversity in canopy architecture, photosynthesis, and water-use efficiency in a cowpea magic population. Food and Energy Security, Vol. 9, Issue 4, e236. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.236.

Egi, Y. and Eyceyurt, E. (2022). 3D point cloud-based tree canopy visualization for a smart deployment of mobile communication systems. In: Shirowzhan, S. (ed.). Data Science, Data Visualization, and Digital Twins, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96179.

Ganji Kheybari, A., Diba, D., Mahdavinejad, M., and Shahcheraghi, A. (2015). Algorithmic design of “Palekane” in order to increase efficiency of daylight in buildings. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, Vol. 8, pp. 35–52.

Köhler-Hammer, C. and Knippers, J. (2014). Arbo Skin Fassaden-Mock up: Fassaden aus dauerhaften und rezyklierfähigen Biokunststoffen. Fassade/Façade, Schweizerische Fachzeitschrift für Fenster- und Fassadenbau, No. 1, pp. 9–12.

Lagios, K., Niemasz, J., and Reinhart, C. F. (2010). Animated building performance simulation (ABPS) – linking Rhinoceros/Grasshopper with Radiance/Daysim. In: Fourth National Conference of IBPSA-USA – SimBuild 2010, New York City, New York, August 11–13, 2010, pp. 321–327.

Lee, J. H., Ostwald, M. J., and Kim, M. J. (2021). Characterizing smart environments as interactive and collective platforms: a review of the key behaviors of responsive architecture. Sensors, Vol. 21, Issue 10, 3417. DOI: 10.3390/s21103417.

Lienhard, J., and Gengnagel, C. (2018). Recent developments in bending-active structures. In: Mueller, C. and Adriaenssens, S. (eds.). Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2018. Creativity in Structural Design, July 16–20, 2018, MIT, Boston, USA, pp. 1–8.

Mahdavinejad, M. (2020). Designerly approach to energy efficiency in high-performance architecture theory. Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 75–83.

Mahmoodi, A. S. M. (2001). The design process in architecture, a pedagogic approach using interactive thinking. PhD Thesis (Philosophy), University of Leeds, School of Civil Engineering, pp. 353.

Malkin, B. (2015). Architecture and engineering in business and IT - tailored, through the use of analogy, to achieve success in large information technology projects. Marder, SA: Enterprise Engineering Australia, 56 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4333.8727.

Mingallon, M. (2012). Introduction to Grasshopper for Rhinoceros. Montereal: McGill School of Architecture. [online] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/41611450/Introduction_to_Grasshopper_for_Rhinoceros [Access Date: March 26, 2025].

Nagy, M. and Katona, V. (2020). Soft folding: A morphogenetic approach to bio-based fibrous construction materials. New Design Ideas, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 85–97.

Petrova, M. (2017). Design for ephemerality – idiosyncrasy and challenges. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, Issue 11, pp. 259–272. DOI: 10.18844/prosoc.v4i11.2882.

Prado, M., Dörstelmann, M., Menges, A., Solly, J., and Knippers, J. (2019). Elytra filament pavilion: robotic filament winding for structural composite building systems. Fabricate 2017, pp. 224–231. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1n7qkg7.35.

Schwinn, T, Krieg, O., and Menges, A. (2016). Robotic sewing: a textile approach towards the computational design and fabrication of lightweight timber shells, In: Arbor, A. (ed.). Posthuman Frontiers: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines, Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), pp. 224–233.

Shareef, A. and Al-Darraji, S. (2022). Grasshopper optimization algorithm based path planning for autonomous mobile robot. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 3551–3561. DOI: 10.11591/eei.v11i6.4098.

Shu, Q., Middleton, W., Dörstelmann, M., Santucci, D., and Ludwig, F. (2020). Urban microclimate canopy: design, manufacture, installation, and growth simulation of a living architecture prototype. Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 15, 6004. DOI: 10.3390/su12156004.

Sonntag, D., Bechert, S., and Knippers, J. (2017). Biomimetic timber shells made of bending-active segments. International Journal of Space Structures, Vol. 32, Issue 3–4, pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.1177/0266351117746266.

Spiridonidis, C. and Voyatzaki, M. (eds.) (2009). Architectural design and construction education - experimentation towards integration. Thessaloniki: Art Of Text SA, 617 p.

Şencan, İ. (2023). Progeny : a Grasshopper plug-in that augments cellular Automata algorithms for 3D form explorations. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), Vol. 28, Issue 3, 12. DOI: 10.54729/2789-8547.1207.

Yang, B., Yang, S., Zhu, X., Qi, M., Li, H., Lv, Z., Cheng, X., and Wang, F. (2023). Computer vision technology for monitoring of indoor and outdoor environments and HVAC equipment: a review. Sensors, Vol. 23, Issue 13, 6186. DOI: 10.3390/s23136186.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055