ASSESSMENT OF TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF LUCKNOW WITH REFERENCE TO CLIMATIC RESPONSIVENESS

Mohammad Arif Kamal

Abstract


Introduction: Traditional architecture, all over the world, has many characteristics that ensure thermal comfort. In the past, people built their houses in harmony with the environment, while also optimally utilizing the building materials available locally. The traditional built form was climate-responsive; it evolved over centuries of experience and observations of climate and nature. The traditional local architecture of Lucknow (a North Indian historical city) has employed some ingenious natural and passive techniques to maintain thermal comfort within the building, particularly during the hottest hours of the day. In this paper, we discuss the traditional built form of Lucknow through the lens of its climatic appropriateness, especially during the hottest hours of the day. Methods: The research methodology involves the study of the thermal performance of two traditional houses and one modern dwelling unit in Lucknow during the climatic extremes, i.e. summer and winter, by means of on-site monitoring of temperature and relative humidity. Results and discussion: We have summarized the comparative analysis of the thermal performance of traditional houses and modern houses and drawn conclusions from the factors that are responsible for providing thermal comfort. The analysis shows that the use of natural and passive techniques in the traditional buildings of Lucknow is very effective in terms of providing a thermally comfortable space, warm in the winter and cool in the summer.

Keywords


Traditional architecture, climatic design, climate responsiveness, Lucknow, India.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asquith, L. and Vellinga, M. (2006). Vernacular architecture in the 21st century: theory, education and practice. London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 312 p.

Bay, J. (2010). Towards a Fourth Ecology: social and environmental sustainability with architecture and urban design. Journal of Green Building, 5 (4), pp. 176–197.

Central Building Research Institute (CBRI) (1969). Climatological and solar data for India: To Design Buildings for Thermal Comfort. 2nd edition, Meerut: Sarita Prakashan, 166 p.

Coch, H. (1998). Chapter 4—Bioclimatism in vernacular architecture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2 (1–2), pp. 67–87. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-0321(98)00012-4.

Kamal, M. A. (2007). Energy responsiveness in traditional residential buildings of Lucknow. PhD Thesis in Architecture and Planning. Roorkee: Indian Institute of Technology.

Krishan, A., Baker, N., Yannas, S. and Szokolay, S. V. (2001). Climate responsive architecture: a design handbook for energy efficient buildings. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw-Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., 409 p.

Krishna, A. and Rewatkar, K. (2006). The relevance of heritage architecture in today’s context. Journal of Indian Institute of Architects, 71 (8).

Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Publications, 150 p.

Robert, A. and Kummert, M. (2012). Designing net-zero energy buildings for the future climate, not for the past. Building and Environment, Vol. 55, pp. 150–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.12.014.

Saleh, M. A. E. (1999). Al-Alkhalaf: the evolution of the urban built form of a traditional settlement in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Building and Environment, 34 (6), pp. 649–669. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00047-X.

Sangkertadi, Tungka, A. and Syafriny, R. (2008). Thermal comfort comparison of traditional architecture and modern style housing in North Sulawesi – Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the 9th SENVAR International Seminar & 2nd ISESEE, December 1–3, 2008, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Sayigh, A. and Marafia, H. (1998). Chapter 1—Thermal comfort and the development of bioclimatic concept in building design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2 (1–2), pp. 3–24. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-0321(98)00009-4.

Sinha, A. and Kant, R. (2000). Urban evolution and transformations: study of medieval and colonial streets in Lucknow. Architecture+Design (A+D), 17 (5), pp. 66–71.

Tandan, B. (2001). The architecture of Lucknow and its dependencies, 1792–1856: A descriptive inventory and an analysis of Nawabi types. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., 321 p.

Vissilia, A.-M. (2009). Evaluation of a sustainable Greek vernacular settlement and its landscape: architectural typology and building physics. Building and Environment, 44 (6), pp. 1095–1106. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.026.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2021-6-1-19-31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055