SEEING THE INVISIBLE. ANALYTICAL DRAWINGS BY CONSTRUCTION HISTORY PIONEERS. RESEARCH FIELD OVERVIEW

Javier Giron

Abstract


Introduction: The history of construction is a discipline that began to take shape in the mid-18th century and throughout the 19th century. We as researchers need to pay particular attention to how drawing facilitated progress during this period. This article attempts to provide an overview of the above, which is currently lacking. Methods: In this study, two lines of investigation intersect: the history of construction and the history of drawing, specifically drawing for scientific and technical representation. The main goal is to identify the sources (authors, lines of investigation) relevant to this field, as well as to characterize the role of drawing in the authors’ work, and to describe the spread of drawing as nonverbal thinking. Results: We have identified a number of relevant authors, described their lines of research, and listed the functions fulfilled by drawing in each case. The functions include: hypothesizing about hidden structures, visualizing the construction processes, and providing a virtual definition for elements that make up a vault. We also review how some drawings acted as a visual model of the constructive reality, or how parallel drawings served as a reflection of the different buildings’ size and scale. Discussion: This overview adjusts some points of reference for a general picture. For having a complete understanding of the subject, it will be necessary to identify more sources and to extend the geographical scope of this search in the future. There is still much research to be done on the spread of the drawings in question.

Keywords


History, drawing, construction, analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bélidor, B. F. (1750). Architecture hydraulique, ou l’Art de conduire, d’élever et de menager les eaux pour les différens besoins de la vie. Vol. 1 second part. Paris: Ch.A. Jombert. p. 152, pl. XIX.

Benndorf, O. (1884). Reisen in Lykien und Karien ausgeführt im Auftrage des K. K. Ministeriums für Cultus und Unterricht. Wien: C. Gerold’s Sohr. p.106, fig. 61.

Blouet, A. (1833). Expédition scientifique de Morée, ordonnée par le Gouvernement Français. Vol. 2. Paris: Firmin Didot. pl. 17-18.

Bourgery, J.-M. (1831). Traité complet de l’anatomie de l’homme comprenant la médecine opératoire. Vol. 1. Paris: C. Delaunay,. pl. 30.

Bressani, M. (1996). Opposition et équilibre : le rationalisme organique de Viollet-le-Duc. Revue de l’Art, 112, pp. 28–37.

Cesariano, C. (1521). Di Lucio Vitruvio Pollione de Architectura libri decem. Como: G. fa Ponte. pl. LV, XLII.

Choisy, A. (1873). L’art de bâtir chez les Romans. Paris: Ducher. pp.40, 61, 65; fig.13, 28, 32, pl. V, XI.

Choisy, A. (1899). Histoire de l’architecture. Paris: G. Béranger. vol.1, pp. 249-251, fig.5-7; pp. 156-158. fig. 3-5.

Cockerell, C. R., Kinnard, W., Donaldson, T. L., Jenkins, W., Railton, W. (1830). The Antiquities of Athens and other places in Greece, Sicily etc. Supplementary to the Antiquities of Athens by James Stuart F.R.S. and F.S.A. and Nicholas Revett. London: Priestley and Weale. pl.4.

D’Amelio, M. G. and De Cesaris, F. (2011). Anatomía de la arquitectura: la tecnología de las construcciones en los grabados de Giovan Battista Piranesi (1720–1778). Actas del Sèptimo Congreso Nacional de Historia de la Construcción, October 26–29, 2011, Santiago de Compostela, Vol. 1, pp. 307–318.

De la Rue, J.-B. (1728).Traité de la coupe des pierres. Paris: Imprimérie Royale.

Durand, J. N. L. (An IX, 1801). Recueil et parallèle des édifices de tout genre, anciens et modernes : remarquables par leur beuté, par leur grandeur, ou par leur singularité, et dessinés sur une même échelle. Paris: Imprimerie de Gillé fils.

Durand, J.N.L. (1809). Précis des leçons d’architecture données à l’École royale polytechnique. 1 vol. Paris: Chez l’auteur, pl. 1.

Durm, J. (1885). Handbuch der Architektur (Theil 2, Die Baustile; Bd 2): Die Baukunst der Etrusker, die Baukunst der Römer. Darmstadt: J. Ph. Diehl’s Verlag. p. 170, fig. 144, 166.

Farish, W. (1822). On isometrical perspective. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1, pp. 1–19.

Fellows, Ch. (1839). A journal written during an excursion in Asia Minor. London: John Murray. pp. 218-219.

Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind’s eye. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Frézier, A. (1737). La théorie et la pratique de la coupe des pierres et des bois pour la construction des voûtes et autres parties des bâtiments civils & militaires. Vol. 2. Paris: C.-A. Jombert. p.395, pl. 58.

Gil Crespo, I. J. and Girón Sierra, F. J. (2009). La influencia del dibujo de Choisy en España, notas para su estudio. In: Auguste Choisy (1841–1909). L’architecture et l’art de bâtir: actas del Simposio Internacional, Madrid, November 19–20, 2009, pp. 235–260.

Girón Sierra, F. J. (2005). El análisis de la construcción romana según Piranesi: ¿fantasía o ciencia? In: Actas del Cuarto Congreso Nacional de Historia de la Construcción, Cadiz, January 27–29, 2005, Vol. 1, pp. 479–488.

Girón Sierra, F. J. (2009). The restitution and drawing of lost methods of wood construction in Auguste Choisy’s Histoire de l’Architecture. In: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Construction History, Cottbus, May 20–24, 2009. Vol. 2. Berlin: Verlag+Service GmbH, pp. 705–712.

Girón Sierra, F. J. (2015a). The «parallel» and the comparative method in Jean Rondelet Traité théorique et pratique de l’art de bâtir. In: Fifth lnternational Congress on Construction History, Chicago, June 3–7, 2015. Chicago: Construction History Society of America, pp.193–200.

Girón Sierra, F. J. (2015b). Understanding Roman construction before A. Choisy: Piranesi and his influence on Rondelet. In: Second Conference of the Construction History Society, Cambridge, March 20–21, 2015. Cambridge: Construction History Society, pp.11–21.

Girón Sierra, F. J. (2016).Willis’s «On Vaults of the Middle Ages» some notes about his heuristic approach, his drawing and Viollet-le-Duc’s reception. In: Robert Willis. Science, technology and architecture in the nineteenth century. Proceedings of the International Symposium Held in Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge UK, September 16–17, 2016. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera, pp.167–208.

Hassler, U. and Pliego, E. (2009). Josef Durm and Auguste Choisy, a working relationship. In: Auguste Choisy (1841–1909). L’architecture et l’art de bâtir: actas del Simposio Internacional, Madrid, November 19–20, 2009. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera, pp. 261–276.

Hittorff, J. I. (1832) (ed. and trad.). Les Antiquités inédites de l’Attique: contenant les restes d’architecture d’Éleusis, de Rhamnus, de Sunium et de Thoricus. Paris: Firmin Didot.

Hittorff, J. I. and Zanth, L. (1870). Recueil des monuments de Ségeste et de Sélinonte. Paris: Donaud. Atlas, pl. 89.

Houël, J. (1782). Voyage pittoresque des îles de Sicile, de Malte et de Lipari. Paris: Imprimerie de Monsieur. Vol.1, pp. 29-31, pl. XXII.

Lancaster, L. C. (2009). Auguste Choisy and the economics of Roman construction. In: Auguste Choisy (1841–1909). L’architecture et l’art de bâtir: actas del Simposio Internacional, Madrid, November 19–20, 2009. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera, pp. 307–328.

Le Bon, G. (1887). Les civilisations de l’Inde. Paris: Firmin-Didot, p.23.

Lejeune, E. (1872). Traité pratique de la coupe des pierres : précédé de toute la partie de la géométrie descriptive qui trouve son application dans la coupe des pierres. Paris: J. Baudry. pl. XLVI.

Leroy, Ch.-Fr.-A. (1834). Traité de Géométrie Descriptive. Vol. 2. Paris: P. Carilian-Goeurey/Anselin. Vol.2, pl. 60.

Le Roy, M. (1758). Les ruines des plus beaux monuments de la Grèce considérées du côté de l’histoire et du côté de l’architecture. Paris: De l’Imprimerie de Louis-François Delatour.

Monro, A. and Sue, J.-J. (1759). Traité d’ostéologie traduit de l’anglais.Paris: Guillaume Cavelier. Seconde partie, pl. X.

Parker, J. H. (1836). A glossary of terms used in Grecian, Roman, Italian and Gothic architecture. London: Tilt; Oxford: Parker; Leicester: Coombe.

Patte, P. (1770). Mémoire sur la construction de la coupole, projetée pour couronner la nouvelle église de Sainte-Geneviève à Paris. Paris: P.-F. Gueffier. pl. II.

Pennethorne, J. and Robinson, J. (1878). The geometry and optics of ancient architecture illustrated by examples from Thebes, Athens and Rome. London and Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.

Penrose, F. C. (1851). An investigation on the principles of Athenian architecture, or the results of a recent survey conducted chiefly with reference to the optical refinements exhibited in the construction of the ancient buildings at Athens. London: Society of Dilettanti. pp. 43-47, pl. 15-18.

Perronet, J. R. (1782-1789). Description des projets et de la construction des ponts de Neuilly, de Mantes, d’Orléans & autres. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

Perrot, G. and Chipiez, Ch. (1898). Histoire de l’art dans l’antiquité. Vol. 7. Paris: Hachette, pl. XLII.

Piranesi, G. B.(1756–1757). Antichitá Romane. Vol. 4. Roma: Nella Stamperia di Angelo Rotili. Vol 3, pl. LIII, Vol. 4, pl. XVIII, XXXI.

Piranesi, G. B. (1761). Della Magnificenza ed Architettura de’Romani. Roma. pp. XLII-XLIV, tav. III.

Piranesi, G. B. (1764). Dimostrazioni dell’emisario del Lago Albano. Roma. pp. 13-14, 21-24, tav. IV, VIII.

Pizzo, A., (2011). Los patibulos son andamios. Giovanni Battista Piranesi y la técnica edilicia de época romana. Archivo Español de Arqueología, 84, pp. 267–284.

Reynaud, L. (1850). Traité d’architecture. Paris: Carilian-Goeury. vol.1 planches, pl. 66; vol. 2 planches, pl. 22-23.

Rickman, T. (1819). An attempt to discriminate the styles of English architecture from the conquest to the reformation. London: Longman.

Rondelet, J. (1802–1810). Traité théorique et pratique de l’art de bâtir. Paris: Chez l’auteur. Vol. 4 planches, pl. LXXV.

Rusconi, G. A. (1590). Della architettura di Gio. Antonio Rusconi con centosessanta figure dissegnate dal medesimo, secondo i precetti di Vitruvio, e con chiarezza, e breuità di chiarate libri dieci. Venetia: Gioliti. pp. 35-36, 60-66.

Simonin, M. (1792). Traité élémentaire de la coupe des pierres ou art du trait. Paris: Joubert. p. 31, pl. XV.

Stuart, J. and Revett, N. (1762). The Antiquities of Athens. In 4 volumes. London: J. Haberkorn, London: Priestley and Weale.

Talenti, S. (2000). L’histoire de l’architecture en France. Émergence d’une discipline (1863–1914. Paris: Picard, pp. 202-220.

Vaudoyer, L. (1826–1832). Arc de Janus. [online] Collections numerisées de la bibliothèque de l’INHA. Available at: https://bibliotheque-numerique.inha.fr/collection/item/35956-arc-de-janus?offset= [Date accessed 08/01/2021].

Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1847). De la construction des édifices religieux en France, depuis le commencement du christianisme jusqu’au XVIe siècle. Annales Archéologiques, vol. 6.,fig. 29-30.

Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1859). Construction. Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française du XIe au XVIe siécle. Vol. 4. 1859. Paris: A. Morel et Cie. Vol. 4., pp. 92-94, pl. 48 ter, 49 bis.

Viollet-le-Duc, E.-E. (1863). Entretiens sur l’Architecture. Atlas, Vol. 2. Paris: A. Morel et Cie, Atlas, vol. 1, pl.1.

Whewell, W. (1830). Architectural notes on German churches, with remarks on the origin of Gothic architecture. Cambridge: Deighton.

Willis, R. (1842). On the construction of the vaults of the middle ages. Transactions of the Royal Institute of British Architects, Vol. 1, pp. 1–69.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2021-6-1-03-18

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055