DEVELOPMENT OF FLOOD-RESISTANT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROPOSALS ON AMASYA YALIBOYU HOUSE AND ITS SURROUNDING

Ozge Kartal, Asena Soyluk, Zerrin Funda Urük

Abstract


Introduction: Calamities, which are characterised as natural disasters, constitute a major problem on a global scale in terms of causing loss of both life and property. Although disaster risk reduction activities have been carried out in many countries, they still cause great losses. Turkey, as a country where many natural disasters have occurred and large-scale damages have occurred, still has problems in disaster management. The purpose of the study: The study aims to develop architectural design proposals to prevent a possible flood disaster in the context of the historic Yalıboyu house in Amasya, Turkey, in accordance with the principles outlined by FEMA and other organizations. While presenting the proposals, the height of the flood waters and the cultural characteristics of the historical texture were taken into consideration and it was tried not to damage the historical texture. Material and Method: In the flood-resistant building design, the principles of organizations such as FEMA, DSI, and AFAD were investigated, design solutions based on the acquired data were discussed in detail through an important historical structure and its surroundings located in the city of Amasya, Turkey. Results: The city of Amasya, located in the north of the country, has struggled with many natural disasters and suffered losses in the past. According to the 50, 100 and 500 year recurrence flood hydrograph, major floods are predicted to occur in the city. Considering that these floods may cause loss of life and property, it is important to take architectural measures and especially Yalıboyu houses, which stand out with their historical texture, under protection. In this historical texture, which is in direct contact with the Yeşilırmak River, suggestions were the first presented in the context of the building environment, and then architectural solutions were gradually developed based on the rise of flood waters at the building scale. Recreation areas that can form reservoirs and basins for undefined and empty areas, permeable materials for vehicular and pedestrian paths, raising the lower level of windows for buildings without high entrances and the use of barriers for doors are proposed for the building surroundings. At the building scale, measures were taken at the first stage by providing permeability with green walls with drainage systems at the points of the first contact with flood waters. In the following stages, flood barriers, flood-resistant building materials, basement fill and flood openings were used to prevent the contact of flood waters with the building. At the same time, it is possible to achieve environmental and economic gains with the rainwater collection system proposal. Conclusion: The proposed solutions have been a precaution against the predicted flood risk by not disturbing the texture reflecting the history of the city. Especially in order to prevent historical buildings from being affected by disasters, evaluations should be made on the basis of each disaster and solution proposals should be presented to the municipality and administrative authorities by the relevant professional groups and implementation should be started.

Keywords


disaster; flood; architectural design.

Full Text:

PDF

References


AFAD. (2021). Amasya Provincial Risk Reduction Plan. [online] Available at: https://amasya.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/amasya.afad/planlar/AMASYAIRAP.pdf. [Date accessed March 19, 2023].

Akın, D. (2018). United Nations Funded Studies on Disaster Risk Reduction. Disaster Management in Turkey. Palme Press.

Al, S. (2018). Adapting cities to sea level rise: Green and gray strategies. Island Press.

Altuntaş, D. D. (2023). Determination of Disaster Risk Factors through Architectural Application Project and Details: The Case of Hayriye Neighborhood in Eskisehir Province, Master's Thesis, Eskisehir Technical University Graduate School of Education, Eskişehir.

Ateş, D. G. (2019). Evaluation of the Conversation Practices Applied In Amasya Province on the Basis of the Desicions of the Conversation, Master's Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara.

DSİ (Turkiye State Water Works). (2015). Yeşilırmak Basin Flood Management Plan. [online] Available at: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/havza%20tan%C4%B1t%C4 %B1m%2023.03.2023/ingilizce/YESILIRMAK%20RIVER%20BASIN.pdf. [Date accessed March 19, 2023].

FEMA. (2013). Action Plan for Performance Based Seismic Design. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

FEMA. (2015). Reducing Flood Risk to Residential Buildings That Cannot Be Elevated.

Genç, F. N. (2007). Natural Disasters in Turkey and Risk Management in Natural Disasters, Journal of Strategic Research, No. 9, pp. 200-226.

General Directorate of Meterology (Turkiye-Amasya) (2024). Seasonal Normals for Amasya Province (1991-2020). [online] Available at: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=AMASYA [Date accessed April 27, 2024].

Google Earth (2024). Location of Amasya in Turkey. [online] Available at: https://earth.google.com/web/ [Date accessed February 18, 2024].

Gökmen Erdoğan, B. (2022). A Model Proposal for Risk Management in Increased Floods due to Climate Change Impact and Its Analysis through the Example of Edirne, Doctoral Thesis, Yildiz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul.

Gökmen Erdoğan, B. and Gül Ünal, Z. (2021). A Model Proposal for Flood Risk Analysis of Architectural Heritage: Edirne Bayezid II Complex Flood Risk Analysis. Megaron, Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp. 367-384.

Güzelci, O.Z. (2012). A Shape Grammer Study on Amasya Yaliboyu Houses. Master's Thesis, Istanbul Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul.

Ikeuchi, K. (2012). Flood Management in Japan. Water and Disaster Mang. Bureau, MLIT, Japan.

Kadıoğlu, M. (2019). Urban Flood Management and Control Guide. Union of Marmara Municipalities Culture Publishing.

Ozcan, E. (2006). The Floods and Turkey. Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 35-50.

Philadelphia Water Department. Permeable Paving. [online] Available at: https://water.phila.gov/gsi/tools/permeable-paving/. [Date accessed March 19, 2023].

Rappazzo, D. and Aronica, G. T. (2016). Effectiveness and applicability of flood barriers for risk mitigation in flash-flood prone mediterranean area. E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 7, p. 12010. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20160712010.

Sarı, B. (2022). Analysis of AFAD and FEMA’s strategic plans in terms of disaster management and sendai framework. Emerg Aid Disaster Science, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 10-18.

Temizkan, S. and Tuna Kayılı, M. (2021). Determination of Optimum Storage Method in Rainwater Collection Systems: The Case of Karabuk University Social Life Center. Al-Jazari Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 102-116.

Tokatlı, S. (2021). Green Facades: A Sample Case Study in Antalya Kemer. PAUD - Journal of Landscape Practices and Research, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 28-38.

Türkoğlu, E. (2006). The Analysis and Evaluation of Amasya, Hatuniye Mahallesi and The Preservation / Rehabilitation Proposals for the Traditional Settlement, Master's Thesis, Gazi University Institute of Science and Technology, Ankara.

Yalılı Kılıc, M. and Abus, M. N. (2018). Rain Water Harvesting in a Garden House Sample. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science (IJAWS), Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 209 – 215.

Yaşar Korkanç, S. and Korkanç, M. (2006). Impacts of Floods and Overflows on Human Life. ZKU Bartın Forest Faculty Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 9, pp. 42-50.

Yüce, A. (2001). Amasya Hazeranlar Mansion. Amasya Culture Publishing, Ankara.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




     

ISSN: 2500-0055